7 Script of "Hunt the Alien" YouTube Video

Script of Hunt the Alien
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello. My name is Tony, welcome to The Alternative Tour of the British Museum. Series 1, Part 7. Titled: Hunt the Alien.

When you look at a series of prehistoric objects there are invariably stone objects that over time evolve to more specialised and finer tools. Then, all of a sudden there is a copper tool, usually associated with the appearance of a new culture. Often the legends of this culture tell of how a God or super human gave that civilisation knowledge of metals, writing etc. If there were Aliens that have affected our history they would have had a big impact on the locals and paintings or statues would have recorded that fact. So the question is, can we see traces of them in the British Museum? I hope that your find the following of interest...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From the neck down this fired clay figurine about 4,500 to 4,000 BC from Vince in Serbia looks human. It appears to be sitting on a chair and the chair is decorated with zigzag patterns. Looking at the body the figure is wearing a coat of some sort that leaves his or her torso exposed, perhaps showing someone with a very narrow trunk.

From the neck up the figure is definitely not human, seen from the front, the head is clearly triangular with a long pronounced nose.

If we now compare this bone figure in the “Early Egyptian” from Matmar in Egypt about 4,000 to 3,600 BC we can see the same triangular face and thin waist, and in the same display there are bone markings similar to the markings from our possible interplanetary traveller’s markings.

Could both of these figures be representations of the same visitor?

In the same Egyptian cabinet are carvings of slim female figures; up until then most females were shown as very large, showing the kind of thighs that woman often get after giving birth to many children. Could the interplanetary visitors have introduced a different set of values, seeing the lady as a holder of qualities, as can be seen in the posture.

Looking sideways at the Head, the face is designed to point upwards. The profile is gently curved.

In the South American galleries there are carvings of people that look like their heads have been taken off and put back with their faces pointing upwards. While we are here it is worth wondering about the various weapons and communication devices some of the “Gods” have got. What kind of technology could that be indicating? The locals seemed to think that blood and fire were in some way involved, could this have induced a warp in the development of future civilisation in South America with its passion for human sacrifice.

In the Greek Cycladic Room you can see the same curvature of the face and extended nose as our friend from Serbia. There is not much in this room, but these figures were buried with the Cycladians. Grave goods can be informative for they sometimes give indications of where the deceased wanted to go in their next life so could the Cycaladians have wanted to live their next live on the home planet of the Serbian visitors?

These examples from Europe, the Mediterranean, Egypt and South America are spread over a large area and with primitive transport these would have been cut off from each other. But, if you were an interplanetary traveller, then these distances would not have been a problem.

There is one problem with the Serbian figure; it does not have much of a brain. If we are looking for interplanetary visitors then it would be reasonable to expect them to be more evolved. The next logical evolutionary step for species development on the line of intelligence would be a bigger brain and therefore a bigger head. However, looking at the back of the head we can see three holes where an extended head could have been attached, but over the last 6,000 year that part is now lost. So we cannot be too quick to discount this example on the grounds of it having a small head.

Going to the Mesopotamia 6,000 – 1,500 BC there are clay figures with faces on the tops of their heads, slim bodies, extended heads, odd looking eyes that can be seen in burial pots around the world, with babies that also show extended heads very similar to a figure from the South American galleries. This is important because, whilst the Immortal Sages of Ancient China do show advanced head development, they were not able to establish this development as a heredic feature for the human race. So, if there is a figure of a child with a head development, it could not be human so its mother probably was not human either.

Taking another track, looking in the Gallery of the Living and the Dying; there are masks showing strong Egyptian features, note the eye shadow connecting the eyes to the temple and the similarity with the White Crown of Egypt. No one knows how old these images are, they could be many thousands of years old, kept alive by having ceremonies extended over 15 year cycles.

Egypt and Papua New Guinea are almost on opposite sides of the world and Papua New Guinea has been isolated for most of its history, so how and why are there similarities in their artwork?

This is not meant to prove anything, but it does show you cannot dismiss the possibility either. And in looking at world history there are three major strands to consider:

1 The natural development of human growth

2. Extra permission to perceive as in the style of the video on Creation and the human.

3. What was added by interplanetary visitors.

When considering the third strand there is the question of experimentation that sources like the bible hint at in Genesis chapter 6. From time to time there are races that explode onto the scene; like the Vikings; could they have had their Genes altered slightly? Then there is the question how truly human are we? And what would that mean should a person decide that they wanted to behave in a true Human way?

If different visitors came here could they have different motives? Just suppose that at the time of King Arthur, Stonehenge was being used as a landing site for interplanetary slavers, and King Arthur went on a quest to find the Holy Grail and stop those slavers. Then it makes it very interesting that a burial pot showing Bug-eyes was found in Bedfordshire dated about 500AD because this puts in Arthurs times.

So the third strand of world history – interplanetary interference – does make understanding world history more complicated but it cannot be ignored if we want to come to a fuller understanding of how we ended up being the kind of people we are to-day.

Link to British Museum Tours Channel site
http://www.youtube.com/user/BritishMuseumtours